Consensus on Auditory Evoked Brainstem Potentials I: Results on sample of normal-hearing adults

Authors

  • Jonathan Delgado Hernández Fundación Canaria para la Prevención de la Sordera. España
  • Franz Zenker Castro Clínica Barajas. Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
  • José Juan Barajas del Prat Clínica Barajas. Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51445/sja.auditio.vol2.2003.0020

Keywords:

Auditory evoked brainstem potentias, scale, normal-hearing adults, amplitude, components, inter-wave interval, interaural difference

Abstract

This article is the first in a series of studies aimed at describing the characteristics of the Auditory-Evoked Brainstem Responses of the  (ABR) in both normal hearing and hard of hearing subjects. In interpreting these electrophysiological recordings, it is necessary to know the normality values of the latency and amplitude of the main components and their relationship with the different intensities, as well as the values of the interwave intervals and the possible interaural differences. These normality values vary depending on multiple factors such as gender, age, stimulation and recording parameters or the conditions in which the ABR are carried out. In this first work, the latency normality values of the components of the ABR are described using the stimulation and recording parameters of our laboratory in a sample of normal hearing adult subjects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

        Visibility and Altmetrics

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Hall, JW. (1992). Handbook of auditory evoked responses. Massachusetts, USA. Allyn and Bacon.

Antonelli, AR, Beloto, R y Grandori, F. (1987). Audiologic diagnosis of central versus eighth nerve and cochlear auditory impairment. Audiology. 26: 209-206. https://doi.org/10.3109/00206098709081550

Schwartz, DM, Pratt, RE y Schwartz, JA. (1989). Auditory brain stem response in preterm infants: Evidence of peripheral madurity. Ear and Hearing. 10: 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-198902000-00003

Musiek, FE, Josey, AF y Glasscock, ME. (1986). Auditory brain stem response: Interwave measurements in acoustic neuromas. Ear and Hearing. 7: 100-105. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-198604000-00008

Musiek, FE, Kibbe, K, Rackliffe, L y Weider, DJ. (1984).The auditory brain stem response I-V amplitude ratio in normal, cochlerar, and retrocochlear ears. Ear and Hearing. 5: 52-55. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-198401000-00011

Rowe, MJ. (1978). Normal variability of the brain stem auditory evoked response in young and old adult subjects. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophicology. 44: 459-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(78)90030-5

Jerger, J y Hall, JW. (1980). Effects of age and sex on auditory brainstem response (ABR). Archives of otolaringology. 106: 387-391. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1980.00790310011003

Patterson, JV, Michalewski, HJ, Thompson, LW, Bowman, TE y Litzelman, DK. (1981). Age and sex differences in the human auditory system. Journal of gerontology. 36: 455-462. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/36.4.455

Robier, A y Reynaud, J. (1984). Auditory-evoked brainstem potentials and stapedius muscle reflex: Itersubject variability. Audiology. 23: 490-497.

Rosenhall, U, Bjorkman, G, Pedersen, K y Kall, A. (1985). Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in different age groups. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophicology. 62: 426-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(85)90052-8

Hecox, K y Galambos, R. (1974). Brain stem auditory evoked responses in human infants and adults. Archives of otolaryngology. 99: 30-33. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1974.00780030034006

Barajas, JJ, Olaizola, F, Tapia, MC, Alarcón, JL y Alaminos D. (1981). Audiometric study of the neonate: Impedance audiometry. Behavioral responses and brain stem audiometry. Audiology. 20: 41-52. https://doi.org/10.3109/00206098109072681

Cone, B, Hecox, K y Finitzo-Hieber, T. (1977). The brainstem auditory evoked response in neonates: A narrative study. Trans.Am. Acad. Ophthalmol. Otolaryngol. 84: 188.

Ornitz, EM y Walter, DO. (1975). The effect of sound pressure waveform on human brainstem auditory evoked responses. Brain res. 92 (3): 490-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(75)90336-4

Coats, AC y Martin, JL. (1977). Human audiory nerve action potentials and brainstem evoked responses: Effect of audigram shape and lesion location. Archives of otolaryngology. 103: 605-622. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1977.00780270073012

Hecox, K, Squires, N y Galambos, R. (1976). Brainstem evoked responses in man: I. Effect of stimulus rise-fall time duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 60: 1187-1192. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381194

Jewett, DL y Williston, JS. (1971). Auditory evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of human. Brain. 4: 681-696. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/94.4.681

Picton, TW, Hillyard, SA, Krausz, HI y Galambos, R. (1974). Human auditory evoked potentials: I. Evaluation of the components. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophycology. 36: 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(74)90155-2

Preasher, DK y Gibson, WPR. (1980). Brain stem auditory evoked potentials: Significant latency differences between ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation. Electroencephalographyc and Clinical Neurophycology. 50: 240-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(80)90151-0

Barajas, JJ. (1985). Brainstem response auditory as subjective and objective test for neurological diagnosis. Scandinavian Audiology. 14: 57-62. https://doi.org/10.3109/01050398509045923

Blegvad, B. (1975). Binaural summation of surface-recorder electrocochleographyc responses. Scandinavian Audiology. 4: 233-238. https://doi.org/10.3109/01050397509043087

Stapells, DR y Picton, TW. (1981). Technical aspects of brainstem evoked potential audiometry using tones. Ear and Hearing. 2: 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-198101000-00006

Mair, IWS, Laukli, E y Pedersen, EK. (1980). Auditory brain-stem electric responses evoked with supratreshold tone-bursts. Scandinavian Audiology. 9: 153-160. https://doi.org/10.3109/01050398009076349

Cacace, AT, Shy, M y Satya-Murti, S. (1980). Brainstem auditory evoked potentials: A comparison of two high-frecuency filter settings. Neurology. 30: 765-767. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.30.7.765

ANSI (1977). ANSI S3.1-1977. American National Standar Criteria for Permissible Ambient Noise During Audiometric Testing. (American National Standars Institute, New York).

Published

2003-02-01 — Updated on 2021-09-15

Versions

How to Cite

Delgado Hernández, J., Zenker Castro, F., & Barajas del Prat, J. J. (2021). Consensus on Auditory Evoked Brainstem Potentials I: Results on sample of normal-hearing adults. Auditio , 2(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.51445/sja.auditio.vol2.2003.0020 (Original work published February 1, 2003)

Issue

Section

e-journal of audiology (archive before 2021 only in Spanish)

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)