Auditio 2023-06-13T12:47:56+02:00 Helia Relaño Iborra Open Journal Systems <p>After 20 years committed to the dissemination of hearing research in Spanish, AUDITIO | The Spanish Journal of Audiology is relaunching as a bilingual journal, and <strong>accepting contributions in the English language</strong>.</p> <p>AUDITIO considers for publication original research articles as well as acceptable secondary contributions (“Research Reports”) in the field of audiology and hearing sciences. Due to AUDITIO’s diverse readership, contributions should emphasize their significance for the <strong>scientific and clinical community</strong>, and the writing style should be adequate for a broad and multidisciplinary audience.</p> <p>To increase the outreach of our publication, since 2021 all articles published in AUDITIO are <strong>open access</strong> under a creative commons license and available <strong>both in English and Spanish</strong>. Contributions can be submitted in the two languages, with the translation being carried out by our team of professional scientific translators.</p> <p>AUDITIO evaluates the submissions in a <strong>rigorous and transparent peer-review</strong>. Furthermore, AUDITIO ensures the publication of articles of interest for the broad audiological community by having a <strong>"third reviewer"</strong>, usually a hearing care professional, who provides additional feedback in the peer-review process.</p> <p>AUDITIO is preserved using LOCKSS and PKP PN, registered in Sherpa/Romeo and has a detailed plan for full indexation in PubMed, DOAJ, REDIB, Web of Science by 2023 and Scopus by 2024. <strong><a href=""></a></strong></p> <p> </p> <p>Indexed in: <a href=";as_epq=&amp;as_oq=&amp;as_eq=&amp;as_occt=any&amp;as_sauthors=&amp;as_publication=Auditio&amp;as_ylo=&amp;as_yhi=&amp;hl=es&amp;as_sdt=0%2C5">Google Scholar</a>, <a href=";from_ui=yes">Crossref</a>, <a href=";_indexrecordidentifier=&amp;creator=&amp;repositoryname=Auditio&amp;f%5B1%5D=title%3AAuditio&amp;items_per_page=10">Recolecta</a>, <a href="">CORE</a>, <a href="">Dialnet</a>, <a href="">ICI World of Journals, </a><strong><a href="">Scilit, </a><a href=";q=&amp;fq=dt%3Aart&amp;source=Auditio">WorldCat</a>, <a href="">MIAR, </a><a href="">Dulcinea, </a><a href="">Sherpa/Romeo, </a><a href="">ROAD, </a><a href=";lookfor=auditio&amp;ling=0&amp;oaboost=1&amp;name=&amp;thes=&amp;refid=dcresen&amp;newsearch=1">BASE, </a><a href="">Publons, </a><a href=";search_text=Auditio&amp;search_type=kws&amp;search_field=full_search">Dimensions</a>, <a href="">OpenAire Explore</a>, <a href="">SemanticScholar</a>, <a href="">Livre!</a>.</strong></p> <p> </p> Colombian Spanish design of the speech-in-noise discrimination test 2023-02-07T15:35:27+01:00 Laura Melisa Buitrago Roa Amanda Teresa Paez Pinilla Eliana Romero Niño <p><strong>Context:</strong> Difficulty understanding speech in noise is a common symptom of auditory processing disorders that impairs communication and affects different age groups. <strong>Objective: </strong>To design a first version of a speech-in-noise (SIN) discrimination test with contralateral and ipsilateral noise and pilot the test in the normal-hearing Colombian population. <strong>Method:</strong> Descriptive, exploratory study for test design and piloting. The pilot sample consisted of 10 men and 10 women aged 18-50 years without a neurotological history. For the statistical analysis, <em>intelligibility</em> of stimuli was measured and three interrelated categories were defined: <em>Mode </em>(contralateral or ipsilateral presentation of stimulus),<em> Ear </em>(left or right) and<em> Noise </em>(signal-noise ratio [SNR] of −5 dB and −10 dB). <strong>Results:</strong> The highest intelligibility was observed at −5 dB SNR, and stimuli were categorized as very easy; intelligibility at −10 dB SNR was 0.95 for words and 0.97 for sentences. The lowest intelligibility for words was 0.76 for the left ear, with ipsilateral noise at −10 dB SNR. <strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to our pilot test, the most suitable SNR is −10 dB. In the next stage of this test validation macroprocess, stimuli that were found to have very high or very low intelligibilities should be modified because they may hinder the interpretation of the test results.</p> 2023-07-17T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2023 Laura Melisa Buitrago Roa, Amanda Teresa Paez Pinilla, Eliana Romero Niño Do complications of percutaneous osseointegration justify a switch to transcutaneous devices? A retrospective longitudinal study on complications 2023-04-14T13:35:49+02:00 Marta Núñez Juan Castro Jiménez Francisco Fernández-Nogueras Jiménez Juan Manuel Espinosa Sánchez Juan Garcia-Valdecasas Bernal <p>Introduction: Percutaneous bone conduction implants are the standard osseointegration model used to provide an alternative treatment option for conductive and mixed hearing loss. In recent years, the indications for these implants have increased, despite concerns about their use because of local complications. The aim of this study was to describe the complications of percutaneous osseointegrated devices implanted at our hospital.<br />Material and methods: A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted in 57 consecutive patients who received a Baha®-type percutaneous bone conduction implantation. The main clinical indications were chronic otitis media and ear malformations. Local periimplant complications were described using the Holgers classification.<br />Results: After a mean follow-up of 12 months (range: 4-48 months), 26.31% of patients had some type of peri-implant soft tissue complication. Only one patient (1.75%) had major reactions requiring removal of the implant. Complications in the paediatric age group were notably higher, affecting 42.85% of the children.<br />Conclusions: The local complication rate in our study was at the lower end of the range described in the literature, which reports a very wide range of rates, even reaching 70%. Most complications are minor and resolve with topical antibiotic treatment. However, the rate is higher in children.</p> 2023-11-02T00:00:00+01:00 Copyright (c) 2023 Marta Núñez, Juan Castro Jiménez, Francisco Fernández-Nogueras Jiménez, Juan Manuel Espinosa Sánchez, Juan Garcia-Valdecasas Bernal The 12-item Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale questionnaire: administration suggestions and guidance 2023-02-19T15:50:29+01:00 Oscar M. Cañete <p>Hearing questionnaires are extremely useful tools for describing people's hearing abilities and for measuring and documenting hearing device fitting outcomes. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) questionnaire is often used and is even available in different versions and formats. However, detailed instructions and guidance for the clinician administering the questionnaire are limited. Below are some suggestions and guidance for reducing variability when administering the questionnaire, thereby maintaining consistency in both clinical and research settings alike.</p> 2023-06-07T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2023 Oscar M. Cañete AUDITIO: progress, transformations, and ambitions for 2023 and beyond 2023-06-09T13:59:54+02:00 Helia Relaño-Iborra 2023-06-09T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2023 Helia Relaño-Iborra Posicionamiento de la Asociación Española de Audiología acerca del grado universitario en audiología en España 2023-06-13T12:47:56+02:00 Asamblea de la Asociación Española de Audiología (AEDA) 2023-06-13T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2023 Asamblea de la Asociación Española de Audiología (AEDA)