Steady-state Auditory Evoked Potentials

Review

Authors

  • José Juan Barajas del Prat Clinica Barajas. Santa Cruz de Tenerife. Spain
  • Franz Zenker Clinica Barajas. Santa Cruz de Tenerife. Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51445/sja.auditio.vol1.2002.0010

Keywords:

steady-state evoke potentials, frequency specific, electrophysiological audiometry, hearing screening

Abstract

The early diagnosis of hearing loss should be carried out early in view of the implications that the lack of auditory stimulation has on the development of language and speech. Up to six months, behavioral audiometries are not reliable, so at these ages, newborns are evaluated using Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE) and Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR). However, these techniques are not capable of deriving selective information from the cochlear partition. Auditory Steady-state Responses (ASSR) are a periodic evoked brain response in time whose frequency remains constant in amplitude and phase. For audiometric purposes ASSRs have several advantages over ABRs. First, through statistical procedures, the presence of response is determined, increasing the reliability and validity of the technique. Second, ASSR allow the use of frequency-specific tones. Third, ASSR allow the derivation of specific information on the frequency of the cochlear partition. This article reviews the principles and foundations of this electrophysiological technique.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

        Visibility and Altmetrics

References

National Institute of Health. (1993) Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. NIH Consensus Statement 1993 March 1-3 11(1), 1-24.

Durieux-Smith, A., Picton, T., Edwards, C., Goodman, J.T., y Mac Murray, B. (1985). The Cri-O-Gram in the NIUC: An evaluation based on brainstem electric response audiometry. Ear Her. 6, 20-24. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-198501000-00006

White, K. R., and Behrens, T.R. (1983). The Rhode Island hearing assessment project: implication for universal newborn hearing screening. Sem. Hear 14, 1-119.

Regan, M.P., and Regan, D. (1989). Objetive investigation of visual function using a non-destructive zoom-FFT technique for evoked potential analysis. Can J Neurol Sci 16, 168-179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0317167100028845

Regan, D. (1982). Comparison of transiet and steady-state methods. Ann N.Y. Acad. Sci. 388, 45-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1982.tb50784.x

Galambos, R., Making, S., and Talmachoff, P.J. (1981). A 40 Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 78, 2643-2647. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.78.4.2643

Stapells, D.R., Linden, D., Suffield, J.B., Hamel, G., and Picton, T.W. (1984). Human auditory steady state potentials. Era Hear. 5, 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-198403000-00009

Stapells, D.R., Galambos, R., Costello, J.A., and Makeg, S. (1988). In consistency of auditory middle latency and steady state responses in infants. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 71, 289-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(88)90029-9

Rayleigh, Lord. (1880). On the resultant of a large number of vibrations of the same pithc and of arbitrary phase. Philosophical Magazine;10:73-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786448008626893

Stapells DR, Makeig S, Galambos R. (1987). Auditory steady-state responses: threshold prediction using phase coherence. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1987;67:260-270. Strasburger H. The analysis of steady-state evoked potentials revisted. Clin Vision Sci;1:245-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(87)90024-1

Hotelling H. (1931). The generalization of Student's ratio. Ann Math Statist;2:360-378. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177732979

Picton TW, Vajsar J, Rodriguez R, Campbell KB. (1987). Reliability estimates for steady state evoked potentials. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1987;68:119-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(87)90039-6

Schuster A. (1898). On the investigation of hidden periodicities with application to a supposed 26 day period of meteorological phenomena. Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity 1898;3:13-41. https://doi.org/10.1029/TM003i001p00013

Fisher NI. (1993). Statical analysis of circular data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fisher RA. (1929). Test of significance in harmonic analysis. Prco Roy Soc London Ser A; 125:54-59. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1929.0151

Zurek PM. (1992). Detectability of transiet and sinusoidal otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1992; 12:307-310. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199210000-00008

Rance G, Rickards FW, Cohen LT, De Vidi S, Clark GM. (1995). The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping suvjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear Her;16:499-507. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199510000-00006

Portada Auditio.

Published

2002-03-01 — Updated on 2021-09-15

Versions

How to Cite

Barajas del Prat, J. J. ., & Zenker, F. (2021). Steady-state Auditory Evoked Potentials: Review. Auditio, 1(2), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.51445/sja.auditio.vol1.2002.0010 (Original work published March 1, 2002)

Issue

Section

AUDITIO 2001-2020