Consensus on Auditory Evoked Brainstem Potentials I: Results on sample of normal-hearing adults


  • Jonathan Delgado Hernández Fundación Canaria para la Prevención de la Sordera. España
  • Franz Zenker Castro Clínica Barajas. Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
  • José Juan Barajas del Prat Clínica Barajas. Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain



Auditory evoked brainstem potentias, scale, normal-hearing adults, amplitude, components, inter-wave interval, interaural difference


This article is the first in a series of studies aimed at describing the characteristics of the Auditory-Evoked Brainstem Responses of the  (ABR) in both normal hearing and hard of hearing subjects. In interpreting these electrophysiological recordings, it is necessary to know the normality values of the latency and amplitude of the main components and their relationship with the different intensities, as well as the values of the interwave intervals and the possible interaural differences. These normality values vary depending on multiple factors such as gender, age, stimulation and recording parameters or the conditions in which the ABR are carried out. In this first work, the latency normality values of the components of the ABR are described using the stimulation and recording parameters of our laboratory in a sample of normal hearing adult subjects.


Download data is not yet available.

        Visibility and Altmetrics


Metrics Loading ...


Hall, JW. (1992). Handbook of auditory evoked responses. Massachusetts, USA. Allyn and Bacon.

Antonelli, AR, Beloto, R y Grandori, F. (1987). Audiologic diagnosis of central versus eighth nerve and cochlear auditory impairment. Audiology. 26: 209-206.

Schwartz, DM, Pratt, RE y Schwartz, JA. (1989). Auditory brain stem response in preterm infants: Evidence of peripheral madurity. Ear and Hearing. 10: 14-22.

Musiek, FE, Josey, AF y Glasscock, ME. (1986). Auditory brain stem response: Interwave measurements in acoustic neuromas. Ear and Hearing. 7: 100-105.

Musiek, FE, Kibbe, K, Rackliffe, L y Weider, DJ. (1984).The auditory brain stem response I-V amplitude ratio in normal, cochlerar, and retrocochlear ears. Ear and Hearing. 5: 52-55.

Rowe, MJ. (1978). Normal variability of the brain stem auditory evoked response in young and old adult subjects. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophicology. 44: 459-470.

Jerger, J y Hall, JW. (1980). Effects of age and sex on auditory brainstem response (ABR). Archives of otolaringology. 106: 387-391.

Patterson, JV, Michalewski, HJ, Thompson, LW, Bowman, TE y Litzelman, DK. (1981). Age and sex differences in the human auditory system. Journal of gerontology. 36: 455-462.

Robier, A y Reynaud, J. (1984). Auditory-evoked brainstem potentials and stapedius muscle reflex: Itersubject variability. Audiology. 23: 490-497.

Rosenhall, U, Bjorkman, G, Pedersen, K y Kall, A. (1985). Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in different age groups. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophicology. 62: 426-430.

Hecox, K y Galambos, R. (1974). Brain stem auditory evoked responses in human infants and adults. Archives of otolaryngology. 99: 30-33.

Barajas, JJ, Olaizola, F, Tapia, MC, Alarcón, JL y Alaminos D. (1981). Audiometric study of the neonate: Impedance audiometry. Behavioral responses and brain stem audiometry. Audiology. 20: 41-52.

Cone, B, Hecox, K y Finitzo-Hieber, T. (1977). The brainstem auditory evoked response in neonates: A narrative study. Trans.Am. Acad. Ophthalmol. Otolaryngol. 84: 188.

Ornitz, EM y Walter, DO. (1975). The effect of sound pressure waveform on human brainstem auditory evoked responses. Brain res. 92 (3): 490-498.

Coats, AC y Martin, JL. (1977). Human audiory nerve action potentials and brainstem evoked responses: Effect of audigram shape and lesion location. Archives of otolaryngology. 103: 605-622.

Hecox, K, Squires, N y Galambos, R. (1976). Brainstem evoked responses in man: I. Effect of stimulus rise-fall time duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 60: 1187-1192.

Jewett, DL y Williston, JS. (1971). Auditory evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of human. Brain. 4: 681-696.

Picton, TW, Hillyard, SA, Krausz, HI y Galambos, R. (1974). Human auditory evoked potentials: I. Evaluation of the components. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophycology. 36: 179-190.

Preasher, DK y Gibson, WPR. (1980). Brain stem auditory evoked potentials: Significant latency differences between ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation. Electroencephalographyc and Clinical Neurophycology. 50: 240-246.

Barajas, JJ. (1985). Brainstem response auditory as subjective and objective test for neurological diagnosis. Scandinavian Audiology. 14: 57-62.

Blegvad, B. (1975). Binaural summation of surface-recorder electrocochleographyc responses. Scandinavian Audiology. 4: 233-238.

Stapells, DR y Picton, TW. (1981). Technical aspects of brainstem evoked potential audiometry using tones. Ear and Hearing. 2: 20-29.

Mair, IWS, Laukli, E y Pedersen, EK. (1980). Auditory brain-stem electric responses evoked with supratreshold tone-bursts. Scandinavian Audiology. 9: 153-160.

Cacace, AT, Shy, M y Satya-Murti, S. (1980). Brainstem auditory evoked potentials: A comparison of two high-frecuency filter settings. Neurology. 30: 765-767.

ANSI (1977). ANSI S3.1-1977. American National Standar Criteria for Permissible Ambient Noise During Audiometric Testing. (American National Standars Institute, New York).


2003-02-01 — Updated on 2021-09-15


How to Cite

Delgado Hernández, J., Zenker Castro, F., & Barajas del Prat, J. J. (2021). Consensus on Auditory Evoked Brainstem Potentials I: Results on sample of normal-hearing adults. Auditio , 2(1), 13–18. (Original work published February 1, 2003)



e-journal of audiology (archive before 2021 only in Spanish)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)