Real-ear measurements by probe microphone. Definition and applications


  • Franz Zenker Clínica Barajas. Santa Cruz de Tenerife



real-ear measurements, audio analyzer, probe microphone, hearing-aid fitting


Real-ear measurements has allowed the audiologist to have a criterion for assessing the adaptation of reliable and valid instruments. The use of these measures in estimating the goodness of adaptation allows us, among other advantages, to take into account individual differences by providing parameters related to the performance of the hearing aid in real ear. In this article we will carry out a review of the main measurements that can be recorded with a real ear audio analyzer and microphone probe and their main applications.




Download data is not yet available.


Hadford, E. (1980). The use of a miniature microphone in the ear canal for the verification of hearing aid performance. Ear and Hearing 1, 329.

Lauridsen, O. y Günthersen, C. (1981). A new probe microphone for investigation of the acoustic of the ear. J Acoust Soc Am 69, 1496.

Lauridsen, O. y Birk Nielsen, H. (1981). A new computerized method for hearing aid fitting based on measurements at the ear drum. Scan Audiol 10, 109.

Pedersen, B., Lauridsen, O. & Birk Nielsen, H. (1982). Clinical measurement of hearing aid insertion gain. Scan Audiol 11, 181.

Pedersen, B. (1982). Probe placement for sound presurre measurements in the aided ear. Scan Audiol 11, 281.

Ringdahl, A, Leijon, A. & Lidén, G. (1982). A new clinical procedure for hearing aid fitting. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh), Suppl. 386, 43.

Hadford, E., Leijon A., Lidén, G., Ringdahl, A. & Dahlberg, A.K. (1983). A simplified real ear technique for verifying the maximum output of a hearing aid. Ear and Hearing. 1, 329.

Leijon, A., Harford, E., Lidén, G., Ringdahl, A. & Dahlberg, A. K. (1983). Audiometric earphone discomfort level and hearing aid SSPL 90 as a measured in the human ear canal. Ear and Hearing. 4(4):185-9.

Schore, I., Bilger,R. & Hirsh, I. (1960). Hearing aid evaluation: Reliability of repeated measurments. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 25,152-170.

Schwartz, D., & Walden, B. (1983). Current status of the clinical hearing aid assessment: A reappraisal of an old philosophy. In D. Konkle & W. Rintelmann (Eds.) Principles of speech audiometry (pp. 321-352).

Beattie, R., & Edgerton, R. (1976). Reliability of monosyllabic discimination test in white noise for differentiating among hearing aids. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 41, 464-476.

Dillon, H., James, A., & Ginis, J. (1997). Client oriented scale of improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 8(1), 27-43.

Cox, R., & Alexander, G. (1995). The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear and Hearing, 16, 176-185.

Byrne, D. (1981). Selective amplification: some psychoacoustic considerations. Pp, 260-285 in: F.H. Bess, B.A. Freeman, and J.S. Sinclair, eds. Amplification in Education. A. G. Bell, Washington, DC.

Byrne, D. (1982). Theoretical approaches for hearing aid selection. Pp. 175-179. In G. Studebacker, and D. Fifield 1974. Evaluation of hearing aid fittings for infants. Br. J. Audiol. 8, 47-54.

Blanco, J. L. (1997). El analizador de audífonos. En: Audioprótesis: Teoría y práctica. Editorial Masson, S.A.

Hawkins, D.B. y Haskell G.B. (1982). A comparison of fuctional Gain and 2 cm3 coupler gain. J. Speech Hear. Disrod. 47, 71-76.

Jirsa, R., y Norris W.T. (1978). Relationship of acoustic gain to aided threshold improvement in children. J. Speech Hear. Disrod. 43, 348-352.

Larson, V.D., G.A. Studebaker, and R.M. Cox. (1977). Sound levels in a 2cc cavity, a Zwislocki coupler and occluded ear canals. J. Am. Aud. Soc. 3, 63-70.

Wetzell, C., and e. R. Harford (1983). Predictibility of real ear hearing and performance from coupler measurements. Ear Hear. 4, 237-242.

Zenker F y Barajas JJ (1999) Adaptación de audífonos en función del promedio del espectro de la palabra hablada. Estudio de un caso único. En: Logopedia escolar y clínica. Últimos avances en Evaluación e Intervención. Editor: José Domingo Martín Espino, Madrid, Editorial CEPE, pp. 329-336.

Muelller, H. (1992). Terminology and Procedures. In Muller, Hawkins, Northern (eds.): Probe Microphone Measurements: Hearing Aid Selection and Assesment. (pgs. 41-66). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group Inc.

American National Standards Institute. (1997). Methods of Measurement of Real-Ear Performance Characteristics of Hearing Aids. ANSI S3.46-1997. New York: American National Standards Institute Inc.

Feigin, J., Kopun, J., Stelmachowicz, P., Gorga, M. (1989). Probe-tube microphone measure of ear canal sound pressure levels in infants and children. Ear and Hearing, 10(4): 254-258.

Martin, H., Munro, K., Langer, D. (1997). Real-ear to coupler differences in chilfrenm with grommets. British Journal of Audiology, 3:23-31.

Scollie, S., Seewald, R., Cornelisse, L., Jenstad, L. (1998). Validity and repeatability of levelindependent HL to SPL transforms. Ear and Hearing, 19(5): 407-413.

Seewald, R. (1997). Amplification: a child-centered approach. Hearing Journal, 50(3): 61.

Valente, M., Potts, L., Valente, M., Vass, W., Goebel, J. (1994). Intersubject Variability of Real-ear Sound Pressure Level: Conventional and Insert earphones. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 5(6): 390-398.

Stemachowicz, P., Lewis, D., Seewlad, R., Hawkins, D. (1990). Complex and puretone signals in the evaluation of hearing aid characteristics. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33: 380-385.

Portada Auditio 2001



How to Cite

Zenker, F. (2001). Real-ear measurements by probe microphone. Definition and applications. Auditio, 1(1), 9–14.



AUDITIO 2001-2020