Comparación de tres métodos de diagnóstico audiológico en la práctica clínica

Jesús Humberto Piña Medina

doi:10.51445/sja.auditio.vol2.2004.0028

Authors

Jesús Humberto Piña Medina División de Salud en el Trabajo, Jefatura de Servicios Médicos del IMSS, Saltillo, Coahuila, México.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51445/sja.auditio.vol2.2004.0028

Keywords:

hearing impairment, steady state, auditory evoked potentials

Abstract

Objective.- Our purpose was to compare the methods of brainstem transient auditory evoked potentials (AEP), multi-frequency steady-state auditory evoked potentials (MF-ASSR) and tonal audiometry (PTA) with each other, and to determine their usefulness as resources. complementary, in audiological diagnosis. Material and methods.- 99 child and adult patients with hearing loss are included for the study and the results of each method used are compared, using absolute agreement and the Kappa index of agreement. Results.- Results were obtained that indicate low concordance between AEP and MF-ASSR, and better concordance between MF-ASSR and PTA. Conclusions.- The use of MF-ASSR, aims to be a very useful tool in audiological diagnosis since it is a clearly objective method, and the results found between the methods, suggest the convenience of using all three when possible to improve audiological diagnosis .

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Visibility and Altmetrics

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Berhman RE, Kliegman RM, Arvin A, M Nelson WE. Sordera. En: Tratado de pediatría. Mc Graw- Hill. Interamericana.15° ed., vol II.1997. Madrid , España 2247-55.

Jerger SJ, Ross JR, Tobey EA. Management of Hearing Loss in Infants:The UTD/Callier Center Position Statement. J.of . Am. Ac. of Audiology 2001;12 (7):239.

Rodríguez MM, Huarte IA. Clasificación y etiología de la hipoacusia neurosensorial. En: Implantes Cocleares. Masson ,2002.Barcelona España. 87-91.

Grienwald JH, Hartnick C. The evaluation of children with sensorineural hearing loss. Head and Neck Surgery. 2001;128 (1): 84. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.128.1.84

Kenna MA, Wu BL, Douglas A. Conexxin 26 studied in patients with sensorineural hearing loss. Arch of Otolaringol. Head an Neck Surgery 2001;127 (9) :1037. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.127.9.1037

Gonzalo DS. Audiometría clínica. En: Audiología práctica. Editorial Médica Panamericana 5° Ed. 1999. Buenos Aires Argentina Cap 17. 171.

Snow JB. Recent advances un auditory and vestibular Research. Ann ORL Mex.1998;43 (1 ):47-55.

Brigss RJ, Fagan P, Atlas M, Kaye AH et al. Multichannel auditory brainstem implantation. The Australian Experience. The Journal of laringol. and Otology. 2000.114 (suppl 27):46-49. https://doi.org/10.1258/0022215001904734

Otero-Siliceo E. Guidelines for clinical evoked auditory potentials. En: Series en neurología #3.1994. México DF.41-53.

Chiappa KH. Evoked Potentials in clinical Medicine. 3° Ed. Lippincott. Raven Press, Philadelphia, 1997, 157-278.

Durieux SA, Edwards CG, Picton TW, MC Murray B. Auditory Brainstem Responses to click in Neonates. Journal Otolaringol. Suppl. 1985; 14: 12- 18.

Durieux SA, Picton TW, Bernard P, MC Murray B, Goodman JT. Prognostic validity of brainstem electric response audiometry in infants of a neonata intensive care unit. Audiology 1991; 30 (5): 249- 65. https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099109072889

Edward CG, Durieux SA, Picton TW. Auditory brainstem response audiometry In neontal hidrocephalus. Journal Otolaringol. Suppl.1985; 14: 40-46.

El Kashlan H, Eisenmann D, Kileny PR. Auditory Brainstem Response in small acoustic Neuromas. Ear and hearing 2000; 21(3): 257-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200006000-00010

Mc Evoy LK, Picton TW, Champagne SC, Kellet AJ, Kelly JB. Human evoked potential to shift in the lateralization of a noise. Audiology 1990;29 (3):163-80. https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099009072848

Mc Evoy LK, Picton TW, Champagne SC. Evoked Potential Measures. Ear Hear 1991; 12 (6):389- 98. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199112000-00003

Picton TW, Stapells DR, Campbell KB. Auditory evoked potentials from the human Cochlea and Brainstem. J. Otolaringol. suppl.1981; 9: 1-41.

Stapells DR, Picton TW. Technical aspects of brainstem evoked potential audiometry using tones . Ear hear 1981 ;2 ( 1 ): 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-198101000-00006

Carmona S, Zujani A. Función Latencia- Intensidad de potenciales evocados auditivos de tronco, y diagnóstico de hipoacusia. Ann ORL Mex 2000;45:109-13.

Stapells DR. ABR TIPS for clinicians. HPLAB internet.. www..hplab.Com.

Coutinho DT. Potenciales evocados auditivos de tallo cerebral. En:Pac otorrino-1. Actualidades en Audiología y Neurotología. Coutinho DT.Merck 1° ed:1999. 11-19.

Reyes L. et al. Potenciales evocados auditivos de tallo cerebral de corta latencia en pacientes infectados por sida. Ann ORL Mex 1999; 44: (1):3-7.

Kemp DT. Stimulated Otoacoustic Emissions from within the human Auditory System . J. of A. Soc of Am. 1998; 64 ( 5) : 1386-91. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.382104

Coutinho DT. Emisiones Otoacusticas. En: Pac otorrino - 1. Actualidades en Audiología y Neurotología. Coutinho DT.Merck.1° ed.;1999. 23-28.

Hatzopoulus S. et al. Efficient Otoacoustic Emissions Protocols, Employed in a Hospital-Based neonatal screening program. Acta Otolaryngol. 2001;121 (2): 269-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/000164801300043802

Cacace AT, Pinheiro JM et al. Relationships between Otoacoustic Emissions and Auditory Brainstem Responses in neonates and Young Children: A correlation an factor analytical study. Laryngoscope. 2002;112 ( 1); 156-67. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200201000-00028

De Ceulaer G. et al. Contralateral supression of transient Evoked otoacoustic Emissions : normative data for a clinical test, set up. Otology and and Neurotology,2001;22 (3): 350-55. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129492-200105000-00013

Govaerts PJ. et al. A two -Stage bipod screening model for universal neonatal hearing Screening . Otology and Neurotology .2001;22 (6): 850- 54. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129492-200111000-00023

Robinette MS, Glattke TJ. Otoacoustic emissions, clinical applications. .Ed.Thieme.New York 1997.

Kimberly BP. Applications of distorsion-product emissions to an otological practice. Laryngoscope.1999; 109 (12):1908-18. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199912000-00003

Picton TW, Kellet AJ, Vezsenyi M, Rabinovitch DE. Otoacoustic Emissions recorded at rapid stimulus rates. Ear Hear 1993:14 ( 5 ): 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199310000-00001

Poblano A, Flores-Rodriguez T, Elias CY, Rios VA, Llano G. Correlación entre umbrales por audiometría convencional y por emisiones otoacústicas de distorsión en preescolares" An .ORL Mex 1996;41(1):43-45.

Vega C. Et al. Otoacoustic Emissions Screening As Early Identification of Hearing Loss in Newborns. Acta otorrinolaringológica Española. 2001;52 (4 ):273-81.

Telischi FM. Ann objective method of analyzing cochlear versus noncochlear patterns of distorsion- Product otoacoustic emissions in patients with acoustic neuromas. Laryngoscope, 2000;110 (4 ):553-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200004000-00007

Lisowska G, Namilowsky G, Marawski K, Strojek K. Early identification of early impairment en patients with type I diabetes mellitus. Otologyneurotology .2001; 22 (23 ): 316-20. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129492-200105000-00008

- Toral ME, Corvera BJ. Sordera central y emisiones otoacústicas, reporte de 3 casos. An ORL Mex 1994; 43 (3):157- 62.

Toral MR et al. Emisiones otoacústicas y audiometría tonal en niños en tratamiento con cisplatino An ORL Mex 1999;44(22):69-72.

Stravoulaky P. et al. Otoacoustic Emissions for monitoring aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity in children with cystic fibrosis. Arch.Otolaryngol Head and neck Surgery.2002;128 ( 2 ); 150-55. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.128.2.150

Haginomori, SI et al. Spontaneous otoacoustic Emissions in humans with endolymphatic hydrops. Laryngoscope. 2001;111 ( 1):96-101. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200101000-00017

Powers NL, Salvi RJ, Wang J, Spongr V, Qui CX. Elevation of auditory thresholds by spontaneous cochlear Oscillations. Nature.1995;375 ( 6532 ): 585-87. https://doi.org/10.1038/375585a0

Werner AF. Otoemisiones acústicas y exposición al ruido. International archives and environmental health.2001;73(5):285-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004200000154

John MS, Picton TW. Human Auditory steadystate responses to amplitude modulated tones, Phase an latency measurements. Hear Res. 2000;141 ( 1-2 ) : 57-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5955(99)00209-9

Linden RD, Campbell KB, Hamel G, Picton TW. Human auditory steady-state evoked potentials during sleep. Ear Hear 1985; 6( 3 ):167-74. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-198505000-00008

- Dimitrijevic A, Sasha JM, Van Roon P, Picton TW. Human auditory stead-state response to tones independently modulated in both frequency and amplitude. Ear Hear 2001; 22 (2);100-11. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200104000-00003

Stapells DR, Linden RD, Suffield JB, Hame G, Picton TW. Human auditory steady-state potentials . Ear hear 1984 5( 2 ): 105-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-198403000-00009

Savio G. Et al. Potenciales evocados auditivos de estado estable a múltiples frecuencias; una nueva alternativa para evaluar la audición en forma objetiva. Acta de otorrinolaringología y cirugía de cabeza y cuello. 1997;25 ( 2 ):87-97.

Lins OG. et al. Frequency specific audiometry using steady-state response. Ear Hear. 1996;1796 (2 ):81-96 https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199604000-00001

Lins OG, Picton PE, Picton TW, Champagne SC, Durieux SA. Auditory steady-state response to tones amplitude-modulated at 80-110 Hz. J. of Acoustical. Soc. Of Am.1994;97(5 Pt 1):3051-63. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.411869

Valdés J et al. Comparision of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady-state responses . Ear Hear 1997; 18 (5 ):420-29. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199710000-00007

- Aoyagi M, Kiren T, Kim Y, Suzuki Y, Fuse T, Kioke Y. Optima modulation frequency for amplitude- modulation following response in young children. During sleep.Hear Res.1993;65 (1-2 ):253-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(93)90218-P

Pérez-Abalo MC, Savio G, Torres A, Martin V, Rodríguez E, Galan L. Steady-State response to multiple amplitude-modulated tones: An optimized method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearing impaired children and normal hearing subjects. Ear Hear 2001;22 (3 ):200-11. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200106000-00004

Rance G, Dowell RC, Rickards FW, Beer DE, Clark GM. Steady-state evoked potential and behavioral hearing thresholds in a group of children with absent- Click-evoked auditory Brainstem response. Ear Hear 1998;19 (1):48-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199802000-00003

Gilron I, Plourde G, Marcantooni W, Varin F. 40 Hz auditory steady-state response and EEG spectral edge frequency during sufentanil anaesthesia. Canadian Jour, of Anaesth.1998; 45 ( 2 ):115-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03013248

Plourde G, Picton TW. Human auditory steadystate response during general Anaesthesia. Anaesth Analg.1990 71 ( 5): 460-68. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199011000-00002

Chloral Hidrate. Micromedex (R): Health Care Series. Vol 107. www.ovidimss.com

Moreno L, Cano F, García H. Concordancia en: Epidemiología clínica. Mc Graw-Hill interamericana, 2° ed. 1994. México DF. 83-90.

San Martín FH, Martín HA, Carrasco DP. Concordancia en: Epidemiología: teoría ,investigación, práctica. Diaz. Santos editorial. 1° ed. 1986 Madrid España. 312.